orchestration

Hierarchical Multi-Agent Pattern

Overview

The Challenge

Single-level supervision cannot scale to complex enterprise workflows with dozens of specialized agents across multiple domains.

The Solution

Structure agents into a multi-level hierarchy where higher-level supervisors coordinate domain-specific managers, who in turn direct specialized worker agents.

Implement this pattern with our SDK
Get RepKit

Deep Dive

Overview

The Hierarchical Pattern extends the Supervisor Pattern to support large-scale, multi-domain agent systems. Like organizational hierarchies in enterprises, it creates layers of delegation and abstraction.

Architecture

            ┌──────────────────┐
            │  Executive Agent │
            │   (Strategist)   │
            └────────┬─────────┘
                     │
      ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
      ▼              ▼              ▼
┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐
│ Finance  │  │Engineering│  │ Customer │
│ Manager  │  │  Manager  │  │ Manager  │
└────┬─────┘  └────┬─────┘  └────┬─────┘
     │             │             │
   ┌─┴─┐         ┌─┴─┐         ┌─┴─┐
   │   │         │   │         │   │
  A1  A2        A3  A4        A5  A6

Key Benefits

Domain Isolation

Each manager agent encapsulates domain-specific knowledge and tools, preventing cross-domain complexity leakage.

Scalability

Add new domains by creating new manager branches without modifying the executive level.

Access Control

Higher levels can enforce data access policies—finance agents see financial data, not customer PII.

Failure Containment

Failures in one branch don't cascade to others unless escalated.

Hierarchy Levels

Executive Level

  • Strategic decision-making
  • Cross-domain coordination
  • Resource allocation
  • Escalation handling

Manager Level

  • Domain-specific orchestration
  • Tool and data access within domain
  • Team coordination
  • Result aggregation

Worker Level

  • Specialized task execution
  • Single-purpose agents
  • Minimal decision-making

Implementation Patterns

Top-Down Delegation

# Executive delegates to appropriate manager
if task.domain == "finance":
    result = await finance_manager.handle(task)
elif task.domain == "engineering":
    result = await engineering_manager.handle(task)

Bottom-Up Escalation

# Worker escalates when uncertain
if confidence < threshold:
    return await self.escalate_to_manager(task, context)

Anti-Patterns

Too Deep

More than 3-4 levels creates communication overhead and latency. Flatten where possible.

Manager Bottleneck

If a single manager coordinates too many workers, consider splitting the domain.

Missing Skip-Level

Sometimes workers need direct executive access for urgent issues.

Enterprise Considerations

A "supervisor of supervisors" architecture enables:

  • Division-scoped data and tool access control
  • Flexibility in agent development and deployment
  • Broad "Ask Me Anything" capabilities with appropriate routing
Want to learn more patterns?
Explore Learning Paths
Considerations

Balance hierarchy depth against latency. Deep hierarchies provide more control but add communication overhead.

Tags
orchestrationenterprisescalabilityhierarchydelegation

Was this pattern helpful?