evaluation

Evaluation-Driven Development (EDDOps)

Overview

The Challenge

Traditional development separates building and testing phases, but LLM agents require continuous evaluation throughout their lifecycle.

The Solution

Embed evaluation as a core driver of agent design, unifying offline (development-time) and online (runtime) evaluation in a closed feedback loop.

Implement this pattern with our SDK
Get RepKit

Deep Dive

Overview

Evaluation-Driven Development and Operations (EDDOps) is a process model that integrates evaluation throughout the LLM agent lifecycle. Rather than treating evaluation as a final checkpoint, EDDOps makes it central to design, development, and operations.

The EDDOps Lifecycle

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 DESIGN PHASE                │
│   Requirements → Evaluation Criteria        │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────┘
                      ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│               DEVELOPMENT PHASE             │
│   Build → Evaluate → Iterate                │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────┘
                      ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│               DEPLOYMENT PHASE              │
│   Deploy → Monitor → Evaluate → Improve     │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────┘
                      │
                      └──────► Feedback Loop

Six Evaluation Drivers

D1: Lifecycle Coverage

Span pre-deployment, post-deployment, and continuous operation. Don't just evaluate before launch—monitor throughout.

D2: Metric Mix Beyond Aggregates

Combine:

  • End-to-end outcomes (task success rate)
  • Intermediate step-level checks (tool call accuracy)
  • Slice-aware analysis (performance by user segment)

D3: System-Level Anchor

Anchor evaluation in system behavior, not isolated model performance. Use model-level probes to explain system-level outcomes.

D4: Temporal Awareness

Track how performance changes over time:

  • Concept drift detection
  • Seasonal patterns
  • Degradation alerts

D5: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives

Different stakeholders care about different metrics:

  • Users: Task completion, response time
  • Ops: Error rates, resource usage
  • Business: Cost, conversion rates
  • Safety: Harm incidents, policy violations

D6: Continuous Improvement Loop

Evaluation findings should automatically trigger:

  • Prompt refinements
  • Agent architecture changes
  • Training data updates
  • Threshold adjustments

Evaluation Types

Offline Evaluation

  • Benchmark suites: Standardized test sets
  • Regression testing: Compare new vs. old versions
  • Adversarial testing: Red-team probing
  • Human evaluation: Expert review of samples

Online Evaluation

  • A/B testing: Compare variants in production
  • Shadow mode: Run new agents in parallel without serving
  • Canary deployment: Gradual rollout with monitoring
  • Real-time metrics: Live dashboards and alerts

Agent-Specific Evaluations

Skill Evaluation

Test individual agent capabilities in isolation.

Trace Analysis

Review complete execution traces for:

  • Planning quality
  • Tool use correctness
  • Error handling
  • Context management

Router Evaluation

For systems with branching logic:

  • Routing accuracy
  • Fallback behavior
  • Edge case handling

Tooling Ecosystem

Tool Strength
OpenAI Evals Custom eval frameworks
DeepEval Unit testing for LLMs
InspectAI Multi-turn evaluation
Phoenix Trace analysis
GALILEO Production monitoring

Implementation Checklist

  • Define evaluation criteria during requirements
  • Build benchmark suites before implementation
  • Instrument agents for trace collection
  • Set up continuous evaluation pipelines
  • Create feedback loops to development
  • Monitor production metrics with alerting
Want to learn more patterns?
Explore Learning Paths
Considerations

Invest in evaluation infrastructure early. The cost of retrofitting evaluation is much higher than building it in from the start.